Игру imperia romanum через зону скачать/pic4367129.png "Игру imperia romanum через зону")
Игру imperia romanum через зону.Thanks for the extra thoughts and suggestions. I have been eyeballing Carthage: The First Punic War for a while. I may get that at some point. For this session you guys have helped me articulate better what it is I am looking for. When I was younger we played Imperial Governor & Strategos which was great but a little light, however it was very cool to see these big armies march around the med as each player commanded a separate power. At the same time I enjoyed Rise and Decline of the Third Reich. I think what i am looking for is an Ancient Third Reich like game. Clearly a wargame but with diplomacy plus economic factors as well. I dont think that is actually Pax, but it looks fun anyway so I am giving it a go. Anyways useful feedback thank you all. [+] Dice rolls. That sounds like IR II to me. I'll add to those who think IR II is the way to go if you don't mind "heavy". If you know the basics of Roman history, there's no other way to explore a comparable amount of history in a single box. I'd say the only real competition is what also used to be known as the "Ancient Wars" series (but really only covers the late republic and early empire): Trajan (or Trajan: Ancient Wars Series), Roman Civil War, Caesar in Gallia, Germania. These are extraordinarily evocative (some people hate the Ptolemaic maps, I loved them) and offer some very nice chrome in the combat systems - even if you use the abstract versions, you get a very nice feeling for the different types of troops and the tactics they support. But the scope is more limited: various Roman factions, Mithridates, Parthians, Gauls, Britons, Germans, Numidians. The 2004 edition, though titled "Trajan", offered all of the other four in a box plus additional counters (cover the Year of the Four Emperors, and Marcus Aurelius). I was a playtester for Rise of the Roman Republic. At the time the system was not really able to capture the pace of warfare - Hannibal never managed to get to the southern part of Italy. The chitpulling looked nice but in the end muddled strategy up too much. Don't know if it has been improved for Carthage. [+] Dice rolls. I'll add to those who think IR II is the way to go if you don't mind "heavy". If you know the basics of Roman history, there's no other way to explore a comparable amount of history in a single box. For all the rules in IR II, I don't think I'd call it all that heavy. I brought this to my non-wargaming group, and they were quite able to play it (though some disliked it). [+] Dice rolls. That sounds like IR II to me. I'll add to those who think IR II is the way to go if you don't mind "heavy". If you know the basics of Roman history, there's no other way to explore a comparable amount of history in a single box. I'd say the only real competition is what also used to be known as the "Ancient Wars" series (but really only covers the late republic and early empire): Trajan (or Trajan: Ancient Wars Series), Roman Civil War, Caesar in Gallia, Germania. These are extraordinarily evocative (some people hate the Ptolemaic maps, I loved them) and offer some very nice chrome in the combat systems - even if you use the abstract versions, you get a very nice feeling for the different types of troops and the tactics they support. But the scope is more limited: various Roman factions, Mithridates, Parthians, Gauls, Britons, Germans, Numidians. The 2004 edition, though titled "Trajan", offered all of the other four in a box plus additional counters (cover the Year of the Four Emperors, and Marcus Aurelius). I was a playtester for Rise of the Roman Republic. At the time the system was not really able to capture the pace of warfare - Hannibal never managed to get to the southern part of Italy. The chitpulling looked nice but in the end muddled strategy up too much. Don't know if it has been improved for Carthage. | |
|
Скачать:
 | |